The Quinoa (for Pesach) Controversy – does Hashem care?


Oy, vey!  The controversy!

Yesterday, I read an article – I think in Perspectives, Toronto’s frum paper – about how quinoa, for years acceptable for Pesach (like beets, it’s botanically a member of the chenopodia or goosefoot family), has now unequivocally been declared kitniyos by the COR, the local kashrus organization. 

They did this not because quinoa is often grown near kitniyos or chometz grains – which is true, but can be checked and labelled appropriately – nor on the basis that it can be ground into flour (because clearly potatoes are permitted even though they can be made into “flour”) but because it grows at the top of a stem – a style of grain called a “wand” or, in Hebrew, sharvit, similar to corn or… well, corn.  There are other considerations as well, but honestly, to me, it doesn’t look so much like a wand:


This decision annoys me to no end, and it seems like I’m not the only one.  I’m sure there will be a HUGE reaction to this, perhaps most especially in Ashkenazi vegetarian circles where quinoa has been the saving grace at Pesach time.  I don’t eat quinoa – don’t trust it, don’t like it… but I’m aghast that so many decent people are going to have to either comply with or knowingly defy this new ruling.

There’s a decent article over here at Tablet magazine which you can read if you want, tracing the history of the various bans and decisions of the agencies (and Reb Moshe’s famous psak that peanuts and peanut oil should be permitted to Ashkenazim – there’s one I just learned about this year!), but as I was reading through the comments section, I came across one that totally rubbed me the wrong way:

Solomon says:

Apr 18, 2011 at 8:38 AM

The Orthodox really get carried away with all these rules. Do they think God really cares if we accidentally ingest a molecule of treyf, or chometz in the case of Pesach? Can’t we just leave it at not eating leavened bread during Pesach and not eating foods specifically prohibited in Torah the rest of the year? The real test of holiness is in how we treat our fellow humans, Jewish or not- with charity, lovingkindness, fairness, etc. and not in obsessing over minutiae of dietary laws.

Here’s my reply, in case you’re interested:

Hey, @Solomon:  "The Orthodox really get carried away with all these rules. Do they think God really cares..."

Reminds me of a certain question we read in the Haggadah last week: "What is this service to YOU?"  (to you, and not to HIMSELF).  You've already built solid barriers between what YOU deem sane, reasonable Judaism and the entire rest of the Jewish world.

Imagine if somebody questioned every Jewish action you took - "do you really think God cares if you're in synagogue on Yom Kippur?"  "do you really think God cares if you give the full 10% to tzedakah?"

It's a slippery slope, to suggest that God is paying attention to YOU, but probably doesn't notice much what other Jews are doing.

p.s.  Look up the word "omniscient" sometime - God certainly knows and definitely cares.

Add your thoughts below or on the original site.


  1. Your post was thoughtful; your response to Solomon was not. It was close-minded, intolerant, and ignorant. The arrogance of Theists thinking they are the special pets of the Lord is distasteful, and causes great damage. The notion of a God with the qualities you ascribe to It, and the reality of the world, are inconsistent. And as you yourself noted, the pompous conceit, and OCD fearfulness of frummies is far worse. Any God worthy of worship is more like your respondent described than the one you apparently pray to. Well.. Chag Sameach!

  2. Thanks for stopping by!
    What I said, I think, is that "do you think God really cares" is a slippery slope that could also be used to do evil, suggesting "do you think God really cares how people treat one another?"
    It's not for us to decide which of things God has told us are big things and which are small things.
    Some individuals and movements have determined that the "bein-adam-l'chaveiro" (how we treat each other) mitzvot are "bigger", ie more significant, than the "bein-adam-l'makom" (how we treat God, which includes following rules we don't fully understand) mitzvot.
    That classification is their prerogative, and I am happy and proud to be part of a nation that is constantly seeking a meaningful definition of God's service.
    But in my worldview, all mitzvot are worthy of consideration, regardless of whether they make sense to little-brain me or not. I do agree with you (and with my original post) that some people take their mitzvah observance, occasionally, to levels that interfere with and perhaps even oppress others. That's a problem for sure.
    But the problem is with God's followers, not with Him or His laws.


Post a Comment

I love your comments!

More great reading